air pollution in Delhi- NCR. The court said paddy was not native to the Punjab, and that a switch to alternative crops may only occur if MSP is not given for paddy but for the alternative crops.
“The switch over can only occur when the MSP is not granted for paddy but is given to an alternative crop, something which the Central Government, in any case, is seeking to encourage by growing and utilization of the traditional crops," the top court order stated as quoted by Bar and Bench. This order came in the backdrop of its direction that farmers should stop the stubble burning forthwith in northern States of Punjab, Haryana and Western Uttar Pradesh saying it was one of the major contributors to air pollution.
Air pollution levels can be high during the winter months for a number of reasons, including dust and vehicular pollution, dry-cold weather, stubble burning, burning crop residues after the harvest season, and commuting. The farmers burn straw stubble which remains in fields after harvest of grains like wheat and paddy, to prepare the fields for the next set of crops.
The bench expressed concern about the government not being able to stop stubble burning, however, it did acknowledge that while stubble burning may not be the sole cause of air pollution, it does remain a substantial contributor. The suggestions to phase out paddy came from Advocate General of Punjab Gurminder Singh.
He suggested to the court that paddy cultivation must be phased out to be substituted with other crops, and the Central government must explore the options for giving Minimum Support Price (MSP) for other crops rather than for paddy. Senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan also noted that paddy should not have been grown in Punjab as it has
. Read more on livemint.com