Shikhar Dhawan gets divorce on grounds of cruelty by wife Aesha Mukerji “If the marriage is not a valid marriage, according to the law applicable to the parties, it is not a marriage in the eyes of law. The 'Saptapadi' ceremony under the Hindu Law is one of the essential ingredients to constitute a valid marriage but the said evidence is lacking in the present case," the court order stated. The order also drew from section 7 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 to conclude that a Hindu marriage is solemnised in accordance with customary rites and ceremonies of either parties.
It also noted that the 'Saptapadi' rite (taking seven steps by groom and bride jointly around the sacred fire), is essential as it completes and binds the marriage when the seventh step is taken. Bengal flood LIVE update: 10,000 people rescued; Governor visits affected areas The court also dismissed the April 2022 summoning order and complaint proceedings before a Mirzapur court against the wife. The court said it “is of the view that no prima-facie offence is made out against the applicant as the allegation of second marriage is a bald allegation without corroborative materials".
Petitioner Smriti Singh and Satyam Singh were married in 2017, but she left and filed a case of dowry against her in-laws. A chargesheet against the husband and in-laws was also submitted by the police after investigation. Later Satyam alleged his wife had remarried; and Mirzapur's Sadar circle office investigated the claims.
The bigamy allegations were found to be false. Also Read: IMD predicts extremely heavy rains in Sub Himalaya West Bengal, Sikkim, and THESE states today. Check forecast In September 2021, Satyam filed a complaint that his wife had sanctified her second
. Read more on livemint.com