Less than 1% of all holders have 90% of the voting power in DAOs: report

cointelegraph.com:

Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) have become a rage in the ever-expanding crypto ecosystem and are often seen as the future of decentralized corporate governance. 

DAOs are organizations without a centralized hierarchy, intended to work in a bottom-up manner, where the community collectively owns and contributes to an organization's decision-making process. However, recent research data suggests that these DAOs are not as decentralized as it was intended to be.

A recent report from Chainalysis analyzed the workings of ten major DAO projects and found that on average, less than 1% of all holders have 90% of the voting power. The finding highlights a high concentration of decision-making power in the hands of a selected few, an issue DAOs were created to resolve.

This concentration of decision-making power was evident with the Solana-based lending DAO Solend. Solend team tried to take over a whale's account and execute the liquidation themselves via over-the-counter (OTC) desks to avoid cascading liquidations across the DEX books.

This is pretty wild. The Solend team wants to take over the whale's account and execute the liquidation themselves. The whale's position is so degenerate that if SOL drops too low it will create cascading liquidations across the DEX books (and potentially bad debt). "DeFi" https://t.co/TEVKz18NSm pic.twitter.com/2A3t2fOhnl

The proposal to take over was passed with 1.1 million “yes” votes to 30,000 “no” votes, however out of these total “yes” votes 1 million came from a single user holding large amounts of governance tokens. The vote was later overturned after a heavy lash back.

Related: How a DAO for a bank or financial institution will look like

The Chainalysis report highlighted that