PayPal moves HC against order holding it as payment system operator under money laundering law
PayPal on Wednesday moved the Delhi High Court against an order which ruled that it was a «payment system operator» under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and has to thus comply with «reporting obligations» under it.
Senior counsel appearing for PayPal argued before a bench headed by Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma that the order passed by a single judge of the high court was «wrong».
Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the appellant, also said that the single judge's order cannot be sustained in view of a recent decision of the high court on the issue of payment system operator.
The bench, also comprising Justice Sanjeev Narula, listed the appeal for further hearing in September.
On July 24, the single judge had set aside a penalty of Rs 96 lakh imposed on PayPal by Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) — India for alleged non-compliance with the «reporting obligations» under the law against money laundering.
It had also ruled that PayPal was liable to be viewed as a «payment system operator» under the PMLA and has to thus comply with «reporting obligations» under it.
The single judge's order came on a petition by PayPal challenging the penalty imposed on it by the FIU.
The FIU on December 17, 2020 directed the company to pay the fine within 45 days and also register itself as a reporting entity with the FIU on account of being a «payment system operator», appoint a principal officer and director for communication within a fortnight of the receipt of the order.
Under the law, a reporting entity has to report to authorities any foreign exchange financial transaction which occurs on its system.
Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU)- India is an organisation under the Department of Revenue, Government of
