Rail strikes show Tories have moved on since promises to defend workers’ rights
When P&O Ferries bypassed unions and replaced 800 seafarers with agency workers in March, the prime minister, Boris Johnson, said his government would “defend the rights of British workers”, and the transport secretary, Grant Shapps, brought in new rules that would make sure workers “are not undercut by employers”, he said. Three months later, the tune is very different.
New laws announced by the government on Thursday aim to make it easier for employers to use agency workers to break strikes. The draft legislation also proposes quadrupling penalties for unions for carrying out unlawful strikes – from £250,000 to £1m for the largest unions.
Pitched by the government as a direct response to the rail strikes taking place across the country this week, the measures are above all a piece of political theatre, positioning ministers against those the business secretary, Kwasi Kwarteng, accuses of “holding the country to ransom”. But are they a genuine threat to the right to strike?
In an unusually partisan press release, the department for business, energy and industrial strategy said the changes would “minimise the negative and unfair impact of strikes on the British public”, suggesting that it does not hold dear the right to strike, even if it is codified on its website. Yet even in those terms there are several reasons why the changes might not work.
Firstly, higher penalties are something of a red herring, because illegal strikes are already vanishingly rare given existing penalties.
Secondly, unemployment in the UK remains at a near 40-year low, at 3.8%. There were 1.7m adverts for unfilled jobs in the UK in early June, according to the Recruitment and Employment Confederation (REC), a lobby group for recruiters. Large
Read more on theguardian.com
