Today news
About the same in other media
SEC v. Ripple: Here’s the full story behind these ‘irrelevant documents’
Reading now: 941
The much-talked about lawsuit took yet another interesting turn. For some context, the SEC had filed a letter on 14 March, claiming the court’s decision to deny Ripple executives’ motion. In addition to that, they argued that the court made the deliberative process privilege (“DPP”) documents under dispute irrelevant to the case.
On 21 March, Ripple and the Individual Defendants filed their response to counter the SEC’s argument. James Filan, a famed lawyer, explained why the Hinman documents weren’t irrelevant due toJudge Torres‘s decision on the Motion to Dismiss.
<p lang=«en» dir=«ltr» xml:lang=«en»>#XRPCommunity #SECGov v #Ripple #XRP Ripple and the Individual Defendants have filed their response explaining why the Hinman documents are not irrelevant as a result of Judge Torres's decision on the Motion to Dismiss.https://t.co/nUMA7bdQ0i— James K. Filan
Read more on ambcrypto.comAbout this in other media
Bumper bonuses for dealmakers mean women fall further behind on City pay fnlondon.com /2 years ago
SEC rejects ARK 21Shares spot Bitcoin ETF application cointelegraph.com /2 years ago
Companies Should Disclose Customers' Crypto Holdings As Liabilities, Says US SEC ndtv.com /2 years ago
Show more
The website fvbb.com is an aggregator of news from open sources. The source is indicated at the beginning and at the end of the announcement. You can send a complaint on the news if you find it unreliable.
