Thank the Finance Commission for a tax-sharing formula tilt that promotes better state-level fiscal policy
Subscribe to enjoy similar stories. The 16th Finance Commission (FC) must be commended for breaking the mould of earlier FCs in what is perhaps the most contentious area of fiscal federalism: ‘horizontal devolution’ or how each state’s share of India’s divisible pool of taxes is worked out.
The 16th FC’s report covers four broad areas—namely, revenue-deficit grants, local-body grants, disaster-management funds and public finances—apart from the two main aspects of horizontal and vertical devolution; the latter refers to the binary split-up of taxes between the Union and states taken together. The report poses five questions.
One, how should the share of states be allocated among 28 states over the award period of 2026-27 to 2030-31? Two, what principles should govern grants-in-aid to top up state revenues and how much should be given? Three, how to supplement the resources of states for third-tier governance? Four, what should be done to finance disaster-relief initiatives? And five, how can public finances be put on a sound footing? To its credit, the 16th FC has tried to combine gradualism with ‘directional change.’ It has kept the vertical devolution to states at 41% of the tax pool, ensuring continuity, but tweaked the horizontal formula by rewarding states that have contributed more to economic growth. This addresses a key grouse of relatively prosperous states that they get too little in return for their role in expanding the economy and filling tax coffers.
It also sends a signal to poorer states that they must get their acts together. This division among states has long been based on a set of criteria with each criterion assigned a weight.
Read on livemint.com