The weighted average cost of purchased Bitcoin recently reached a level signifying that all investors who have consistently dollar-cost averaged into the leading cryptocurrency are now in the black, regardless of how long they have been holding.
Just a reminder that every single pleb who has been dollar cost averaging #bitcoin is now in profit no matter when they first started DCA'ing. Every single one of them! pic.twitter.com/pnuIqdQznM
This news comes despite the price of Bitcoin, as measured in U.S. dollars, still being down by over 50% from its all-time high of around $69,000.
And yet, many financial pundits in the space still cling to the notion of Bitcoin’s (BTC) entire existence and market cap of nearly $600 billion being based on a Ponzi scheme of some sort. Others continue to deny that saving in the hardest form of money ever known has, so far, been an excellent investment thesis — one that has outperformed all others.
Yes, there may be risks. And yes, volatility definitely comes with the territory. But looking at such factors in a vacuum does not make for adequate analysis of any investment. The alternative strategies available must be taken into consideration, along with other variables such as:
These are just a few potential questions that could be worth investigating when it comes to arguments against dollar-cost averaging (DCAing) into BTC for the long term.
Some investors, like those at Adamant Research, have been pointing out the reality of Bitcoin’s most favorable risk/reward ratio for many years:
The group made similar statements during the bear markets of 2015 and 2011 as well.
How has a standard 60/40 portfolio fared over the last five years? What about gold? Real estate?
The following chart illustrates the
Read more on cointelegraph.com