National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) to investigate and penalise the misconduct of chartered accountants. A bench of Justices Yashwant Varma and Dharmesh Sharma dismissed petitions filed by individual chartered accountants and auditing firms, such as Deloitte Haskins and Sells LLP and Federation of Chartered Accountants Association, saying there was no merit in their challenge.
Delhi Election Results
Top battlegrounds: What's happening where
D-day for Delhi: Top newsmaking moments
The bench, however quashed the show-cause notices issued to the petitioners as well as the consequent final orders on the ground that the procedure «clearly lacked attributes of neutrality and a dispassionate appraisal».
The petitioners had raised several objections to the legal framework, including that the provisions amounted to the creation of a vicarious liability on audit firms and their partners, adoption of a summary procedure for trial and retroactive operation.
«We uphold the validity of section 132 (of the Companies Act) and the NFRA Rules. We find no merit in the challenge based on the arguments of vicarious liability, retroactive operation and a violation of Article 20(1) of the Constitution. We also find ourselves unable to sustain the challenge to those provisions which were asserted to suffer from the vice of manifest arbitrariness and deprivation of a fair procedure,» the bench said in an order passed on February 7.
«The prescription of a summary procedure for the trial of disciplinary matters