(Reuters) — The labels “dove” and “hawk” have long been used by central bank watchers to describe the monetary policy leanings of policymakers, with a dove more focused on risks to the labor market and a hawk more focused on the threat of inflation.
The topsy-turvy economic environment of the coronavirus pandemic sidelined those differences, turning Fed officials at first universally dovish as they sought to provide massive accommodation to a cratering economy, and then, when inflation surged, into hawks who uniformly backed aggressive rate hikes. Now, divisions are more evident, and the choices — to raise rates again, skip for now but stay poised for more later, or take an extended pause – more varied.
All 12 regional Fed presidents discuss and debate monetary policy at Federal Open Market Committee meetings, held eight times a year, but only five cast votes at any given meeting, including the New York Fed president and four others who vote for one year at a time on a rotating schedule.
The following graphic offers a stab at how officials stack up on their outlook for Fed policy and how to balance their goals of stable prices and full employment. The designations are based on comments and published remarks; for more on the thinking that shaped these hawk-dove designations, click on the photos in the graphic.
Dove Dovish Centrist Hawkish Hawk
Austan John Jerome Chistopher
Goolsbee, Williams, Powell, Fed Waller,
Chicago Fed New York Chair, Governor,
President, Fed permanent permanent
2023 voter: President, voter: “It is voter: “If
“Hopefully permanent certainly inflation
we're going to voter: «To possible that does not
continue to me, the we would continue to
see debate is raise the show
improvement on
Read more on investing.com