G7 calls for humanitarian pauses in Israel-Gaza war - What does this mean and how is it different from ceasefire?
Israeli ambassador Naor Gilon urges Indians to light a ‘Diya of Hope’ for hostages held by Hamas Several terms have come to the fore since fighting began last month – with calls for a truce, a humanitarian truce, de-escalation, a humanitarian ceasefire and a cessation of hostilities. There is no clear definition for each of these concepts with all referring to a break in fighting – of varying lengths. A pause is simply considered less formal and shorter than a ceasefire.
Reports citing various experts agree that a ceasefire or cessation of hostilities would refer to a permanent end to hostilities. A ceasefire agreement could act as the precursor to negotiations while a ‘humanitarian pause’ is temporary and serves a singular purpose. It is pertinent to note here that such an agreement would apply to both Israel and Hamas-led Gaza.
ALSO READ: US's Antony Blinken says Israel should not 'reoccupy' Gaza Last month the US and Russia had championed rival plans at the United Nations to support Palestinian civilians caught in the crossfire. The US and its pro-Israel allies have repeatedly sought pauses that would allow aid to enter Gaza. Meanwhile, Moscow had pushed for a humanitarian ceasefire – an idea backed by Arab states.
“All parties must allow unimpeded humanitarian support for civilians, including food, water, medical care, fuel and shelter, and access for humanitarian workers. We support humanitarian pauses and corridors to facilitate urgently needed assistance, civilian movement and the release of hostages," said the latest statement released by foreign ministers of the US, Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Japan and Italy. It however remains a moot point at present with Israel staunchly refusing to implement either a
. Read more on livemint.com
