Akbar and Sita, respectively. As reported by Times of India, Agrawal, a 1994-batch IFS officer who was serving as Tripura's chief wildlife warden at the time, documented the names Akbar and Sita for the lion couple in the dispatch register before sending them to Siliguri.
The suspension came after a complaint was filed by the VHP to the Calcutta High Court, alleging that the names were offensive to religious sentiments. A lion named 'Akbar' and a lioness named 'Sita' were transferred from Tripura’s Sepahijala Zoological Park to the Bengal Safari Park in Siliguri on February 12.
The VHP filed a petition before the circuit bench requesting a name change, citing that the names had offended the religious sentiments of some citizens. “The court expressed its displeasure over the naming...," said advocate Subhankar Dutta, representing the VHP, who mentioned that the issue would soon be brought before a regular bench of the High Court.
Also Read: Vishva Hindu Parishad's plea against naming lioness 'Sita' at Siliguri zoo: 'We worship lions', says Calcutta High Court Earlier on February 22, the Calcutta High Court judge observed orally, “An animal should not be named after any deity or figure belonging to any religion." The court said that India is a secular country and every community has the right to pursue or follow their own religion. “Why should you draw controversy by naming a lioness and a lion after Sita and Akbar?" The judge said Sita is worshipped by a large section of citizens, while Akbar “was a very successful and secular Mughal emperor." Moreover, Justice Bhattacharya said he did not support the names of both animals, PTI reported.
Read more on livemint.com