IPL) owners meet, which was organised by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), Delhi Capitals (DC) was against the impact player rule while Sunrisers Hyderabad was (SRH) in favour of seven retentions, according to ESPNcricinfo.
ET Guide to ITR
Missed ITR deadline: These people won't pay penalty
How to file ITR after July 31 deadline?
What is the penalty for filing ITR after the July 31 deadline
BCCI organised the meeting with the owners of the ten franchises to discuss various points concerning retentions for the upcoming IPL 2025 season. According to the report, the frequency of the mega auctions and the auction purse were among the other points discussed.
After the meeting, the Delhi-based franchise co-owner Parth Jindal said that some teams want the impact player rule because it gives a chance to the young players to play in the T20 tournament.
«Some people want it because it gives a chance to young players to play in the IPL. Some people don't want it because it is detrimental to Indian cricket in terms of the development of allrounders. So it's a mixed bag. I'm on the second camp. I don't want it. I prefer the game as it is 11 versus 11, and I think allrounders are very important. And you have different players who don't bowl in the IPL or don't bat in the IPL because of this rule, which is not good for Indian cricket,» Jindal was quoted by ESPNcricinfo as saying.
The report stated that Sunrisers Hyderabad owner Kavya Maran suggested that «players could be secured via a plain retention process or a