cow slaughter in the national capital pursuant to a law enacted by the city government. It said for other states, the petitioner was free to take appropriate steps in light of a Supreme Court decision, which held that legislature cannot be compelled to come out with a particular legislation. «The Supreme Court observed that only a competent legislature can decide such questions arising in relation to prohibition of slaughter of cow and its progeny, and the Supreme Court, in exercise of its writ jurisdiction, cannot compel the legislature to promulgate a particular legislation. The court ultimately left it to the appellants in the case to approach the legislature,» said a bench, also comprising Justice Sanjeev Narula, in an order passed last week. «There is already an Act in force in the State of Delhi as discussed above which provides for ban on slaughter of cattle, and in respect of other states the Petitioner shall certainly be free to take appropriate steps in light of the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court,» the court said. The petitioner prayed for a direction to the Centre for a «total prohibition» on the «slaughter of cow and its progeny which includes old-useless bulls, bullocks and old buffaloes and male counterpart, without any further delay».
You Might Also Like:ED, CBI, IT only three strong parties in NDA, claims Uddhav Thackeray
In light of the top court's order, the high court said the petitioner «cannot press for the reliefs sought in this petition». The Centre, represented by its counsel Monika Arora, submitted that all the states and Union territories have enacted legislation to restrict/ban slaughter of cows and its progeny, except five states and one Union Territory, i.e., Arunachal Pradesh,
Read more on economictimes.indiatimes.com