New banking rules proposed last year by US regulators were “extremely aggressive” and are likely to be “materially wound back” before being put in place, Morgan Stanley Chairman James Gorman said.
“They’ll definitely change,” Gorman said in a Bloomberg Television interview Wednesday, noting that regulators have received thousands of comments about the proposed rules. “It was a proposal that I would say was extremely aggressive and set a marker. It will not go through in that form. If it did, I think it would have very, very negative consequences for corporate lending across this country, which is not what you want. It’s not going to help the economy grow.”
The financial world has been in a heated debate over the U.S. proposals tied to what’s called the Basel III Endgame — an international overhaul initiated more than a decade ago in response to the financial crisis of 2008. If approved by U.S. watchdogs, the rules would require big banks to increase their capital cushion by almost 20% to ensure they can survive another crunch.
The Federal Reserve and other regulators say the changes can help avoid turmoil such as last year’s meltdowns of midsize banks. But bankers have been increasingly vociferous in their arguments against the proposals, saying they are unnecessary and will drive up interest rates for first-time homebuyers as well as underserved and low-to-moderate-income borrowers. They also say the plans will push riskier lending further outside regulator purview.
“What was put out is highly, highly, highly unlikely to be what is ultimately regulated,” Gorman said. “I think this is a highly aggressive proposal that will be materially wound back when it finally becomes law or regulation.”
Gorman announced in May he
Read more on investmentnews.com