Kohrra and Rana Naidu ruffled some feathers. There’s also concern about the potential impact of a consultation paper proposed by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) for regulating OTT platforms, including content providers.
Additionally, certain revisions in the Cinematograph (Amendment) Bill have necessitated a review of age classifications if a film is to be screened on platforms following its theatrical release. “Essentially, with a surge in OTT consumption post-covid, there has been a rise in complaints against content, and the idea has been to find a balance between creative expression and what may be seen as sensitive.
Discussions with the government happen, though there is some concern of late on the Trai consultation paper for the technology apps that may also take a look at content platforms," the legal head of a streaming service said on condition of anonymity. Furthermore, platforms are still not clear whether amendments to the cinematograph Bill require a re-evaluation of age classification and whether there is a necessity for censor board approval if a film is to be shown on a secondary platform.
“Overall, all platforms are being cautious post the Tandav incident and the intention is to not hurt any sentiments," the legal head added. OTTs have sworn to ensure that movies and shows do not threaten security of the state, public order, beliefs and views of racial and religious groups, and display age-based classification prominently.
They have also said that self-regulatory bodies will be adequately trained and strengthened. Subhash Bhutoria, founder and managing partner, Law SB, said the platforms have reiterated all that is mentioned in the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and
. Read more on livemint.com