«We are not inclined to entertain the present petition in as much as the prayers made in the petition are within the domain of policy of the state,» the bench noted, «if the petitioner so desires, he may make an application to the appropriate authority which would be considered in accordance with law».
The petitioner's counsel asserted that the PIL did not seek publicity while referring to news reports over people falling ill after the consumption of food offerings or «prasad» at various temples.
«Why only restricting it to prasadam? File it for food in hotels, food items that we purchase from the grocery (stores). There may also be adulteration there,» the bench remarked.
The petitioner's counsel said it was not the case of temples being at fault as they lacked the wherewithal to check the quality of supplies.
Marketing
Digital marketing — Wordpress Website Development
By — Shraddha Somani, Digital Marketing Trainer, Consultant, Strategiest and Subject Matter expert
Finance
Startup Fundraising: Essential Tactics for Securing Capital
By — Dr. Anu Khanchandani, Startup Coach with more than 25 years of experience
Marketing
Performance Marketing for eCommerce Brands
By — Zafer Mukeri, Founder- Inara Marketers
Web Development
C++ Fundamentals for Absolute Beginners
By — Metla Sudha Sekhar, IT Specialist and Developer
Strategy
Succession Planning Masterclass
By — Nigel Penny, Global Strategy Advisor: NSP Strategy Facilitation Ltd.
Office Productivity
Microsoft Word Mastery: From Beginner to Expert
By — CA Raj K Agrawal,