A reduction of $15bn in the value of Revolut, the would-be “Amazon of banking”, sounds enormous until you remember the starting point.
Back in 2021, the last time the privately owned company’s valuation created a stir, the valuation was $33bn – in that case supported by a hard transaction in which SoftBank and Tiger Global Management, two established backers, led a $800m round of fresh investment.
Since the entire tech universe, or most of it, has suffered a hefty devaluation since 2021, it’s not surprising that Schroders would reach for the scissors when estimating a fair value for the comparatively modest stake in Revolut it holds in one of its investment trusts. When there are no recent transactions to use as a yardstick, valuing unlisted companies involves making judgments.
In fact, one can easily look at the Revolut valuation conundrum through the other end of the telescope and ask: isn’t $18bn still a bit punchy in today’s colder climate in tech-land?
One of the absurdities from 2021 – that Revolut was worth more than NatWest – has reversed: the rehabilitated high street lender now has a market capitalisation of £26bn versus the eight-year-old firm’s £14.2bn (in sterling terms). But one can still scan the list of FTSE 100 financial stocks and find startling comparisons.
Try Legal & General, the solid and successful asset manager and insurer, with a market capitalisation of £15bn. Can Revolut, which made a profit of £26m in 2021, really be worth almost as much as a FTSE 100 company that recently reported a 12% increase in after-tax profit to £2.3bn?
Revolut is young, growing and increasingly global (it’s just about to launch in Brazil, for instance), goes the bullish argument. The company is not being valued on today’s
Read more on theguardian.com