In 2021, S&P Global Ratings began publishing alphanumeric ESG credit indicators for publicly rated entities in some sectors and asset classes.
Since 2021 the debt rating agency has used a scoring system of one to five to denote a company's ESG-related risk. Five is the lowest grade exposure, one is the highest.
However, last week S&P changed tack. In a statement on Friday (4 August), it said that it will offer ESG analysis in text only, not numbered scores, «effective immediately».
The rating agency said: «We have determined that the dedicated analytical narrative paragraphs in our credit rating reports are most effective at providing detail and transparency on ESG credit factors material to our rating analysis.»
EFAMA: ESG ratings should be used 'with caution'
S&P's reversal sets it apart from Moody's, one of its main debt rating rivals, which also rates ESG factors using a one to five scale. Debt ratings can raise or lower a company's borrowing costs, making them an influential measure.
ESG ratings specifically are facing particular criticism from Republicans in the US, who believe ESG factors are a backdoor for liberal values. Conservative state attorneys-general last year opened an investigation into S&P's use of ESG criteria.
Tom Lyon, a professor at University of Michigan's business school who has studied ESG ratings, told the FT that S&P's move was «just the latest example of a company crumpling in the face of these Republican attacks».
Their attacks have also overshadowed real concerns about ESG ratings sold by S&P and other financial firms, Lyon said. «They are not that reliable and they disagree.»
FCA's ESG ratings launch overshadowed by Japan's winning progress
The move comes amid scepticism over ESG
Read more on investmentweek.co.uk