Techno-optimism vs dystopia: the right AI balance for inventors, investors
Subscribe to enjoy similar stories. New Delhi: The onslaught of artificial intelligence has polarized many, but innovators, inventors, and investors all agree that its impact will be felt across all facets of life. More important, it is critical to define both the benefits and risks from AI.
In a dissertation on the philosophies of AI in its present form, Vinod Khosla, co-founder of Sun Microsystems and founder of Khosla Ventures, argues that global AI innovation and investments will create a clear divide between dystopian and utopian approaches. In turn, the philosophy pursued by innovators will define how investments in AI will be made in the coming decades. Khosla, an iconic Silicon Valley entrepreneur, was one of the early investors in Sam Altman’s OpenAI—investing $50 million in the venture three years prior to the public launch of ChatGPT.
The fund also participated in OpenAI’s recent $6.6 billion round earlier this year. Khosla also invested in India’s generative AI startup, Sarvam. Industry experts say that determining a stance in the AI argument will be crucial in how humankind innovates on the technology, the guardrails that are implemented in it, and the eventual form that it will take in the long run.
Elaborating upon the utopian stance, Khosla said, “Imagine a post-scarcity economy where technology eliminates material limitations… and scarcity becomes obsolete—most jobs (will go) away. Yet, we’d still have enough abundance to pay citizens via some redistribution effort so they can cover a minimum standard of living materially higher than today’s minimum." Yet, on the other end of the spectrum, Khosla argued that risks associated with innovating upon AI “are real, but manageable". “In the present debate, the
. Read more on livemint.com
