

The Oscars have rolled back the red carpet for AI—should we give the Academy a standing ovation?
Subscribe to enjoy similar stories.As part of a substantive change in rules, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has emphasized that only acting “demonstrably performed by humans” and “human-authored” writings will qualify for Oscar awards. The rules have been updated to address cases like that of an AI-generated version of the deceased actor Val Kilmer vying for an award.Note that AI usage in Oscar-nominated movies in 2024 and 2025 focused on augmentation—including voice cloning and enhancement and visual effects—rather than creation. For example, in The Brutalist, AI had enhanced actors’ Hungarian accents.
Moreover, the Academy didn’t ban the use of AI in films; it said that AI techniques applied outside of performing and writing “neither help nor harm the chances of achieving a nomination.”However, the use of AI technology has stirred up a debate, with some people issuing apocalyptic warnings that it might irreversibly damage the human experience. One can revisit 2023, when German photographer Boris Eldagsen created a sensation by turning down the prestigious Sony World Photography Award because his prize-winning image was generated by using AI, as he admitted. According to Eldagsen, he intended to check whether competitions were ready for AI-generated pictures.
They were not, he said. “We, the photo world, need an open discussion,” he added. However, it seems like many issues associated with AI usage concern a broad spectrum of the creative industry.Today, AI-generated writings are among the greatest worries.
Read on livemint.com