PTI, the court has “only decided on the issue of proof and not faith," a single bench of Justice Gautam Patel said, while dismissing the suit originally filed by Khuzaima Qutbuddin after the death of his brother and former Syedna, Mohammed Burhanuddin, in January 2014 at the age of 102. After the passing of Burhanuddin, his second son, Mufaddal Saifuddin, became the Syedna of the Dawoodi Bohra community. In 2016, following the death of Khuzaima Qutbuddin, his son Taher Fakhriddin continued a legal suit, asserting that his father had been given the authority by a secret "nass" (succession conferment) to be the Syedna's successor.
The lawsuit aimed to prevent Saifuddin from carrying out his responsibilities as Syedna, PTI reported. Qutbuddin claimed that his brother, Burhanuddin, had appointed him as mazoon (second-in-command) and privately anointed him as the successor through a secret conferment of succession before the formal mazoon announcement on December 10, 1965. Fakhruddin claimed that his father before dying conferred and appointed him for the position.
Justice Patel, while dismissing the suit, said, "I don't want any upheavals. I have kept the judgment as neutral as possible. I have only decided on the issue of proof and not faith." The Dawoodi Bohras are a religious denomination among Shia Muslims.
Traditionally a community of traders and entrepreneurs, it has more than 5 lakh members in India and over 10 lakh across the world. The community's top religious leader is known as the Dai-al-Mutlaq (most senior). As per faith and Dawoodi Bohra doctrine, a successor is appointed through “divine inspiration".
Read more on livemint.com