Did the Democrats circumvent democracy by selecting Harris? Shark Tank star Kevin O'Leary thinks so
O'Leary drew parallels to the 2016 Democratic primary, arguing that the party favored Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders, limiting competition. He contended that the Democratic National Committee's bias in that election mirrored the current situation with Harris. Despite pushback from the panelists, including CNN's Abby Phillips, who argued that Harris did compete in the primary process, O'Leary maintained his stance, claiming many Democrats felt sidelined in favor of a predetermined nominee.
Also Read: US election 2024 results: Can Kamala Harris become the first female president in US history?
The panel erupted with disagreements, with O'Leary emphasizing that Harris's selection represents a repeated trend of the party avoiding true democratic competition. Phillips countered that political parties have the right to choose their nominees as they see fit, asserting that such choices are not bound by constitutional requirements. The exchange underscored a divide over what constitutes a fair and democratic process in party nominations.
O'Leary concluded that for many Democrats, the fairness of the primary process is critical, especially in light of Harris's nomination. He argued that while the mechanics of the primary system may not be constitutionally mandated, they impact the perception of democracy within the party. His comments reflect ongoing tensions within the Democratic Party regarding candidate selection and the broader implications for voter trust.
Marketing
Digital marketing — Wordpress Website
