Emotional response to climate change affects policy preference to tackle it
climate change whether it is guilt, anger, hope or fear could have a bearing on their climate policy preferences, a new research has found It found that while the guilty atone through options requiring them to shell out money like fossil fuel tax, those feeling hopeful or sad about climate change place their faith in proactive policies, such as investing in infrastructure.
Individuals angry about climate change too were found to be comfortable with money-extracting policies.
However, the research, led by George Mason University, Virginia, US, found that those fearful of climate change were the ones most likely to support any and all kinds of policies, especially regulatory ones such as those around carbon emissions.
The researchers said that existing research has not explored the unique links between specific emotions and the types of climate policies these emotions drive an individual to support. The study is published in the journal PLoS Climate.
The findings showed that emotional investment can help raise awareness of important issues and galvanise an otherwise apathetic public, they said.
For example, individuals and organisations advocating for proactive climate solutions might appeal to feelings of hope, they said.
For the study, the researchers used surveys to examine how common emotional reactions to climate change — guilt, anger, hope, sadness and fear — influenced one's policy preferences.
The survey questions enquired about the respondents' emotional response to climate change, and support for
