"HSBC's problem is that it just doesn't have enough good people"
HSBC is winding down itsM&A and equity capital markets (ECM) businesses in Europe and the US. While insiders purport to be surprised, the closures have an air of inevitability. HSBC's bankers are peculiarly unproductive in terms of revenues per head. In the Americas, Dealogic says HSBC ranked outside the top 10 for M&A and ECM last year. In Europe, it squeezed in with a ninth position in ECM, down from 7th in 2023.
Get Morning Coffee ☕ in your inbox. Sign up here.
It's not, however, for want of trying.
Over the years, HSBC has spent billions trying to build out its investment bank on the back of its huge balance sheet. John Studzinski, who ran the investment bank between 2003 and 2005 was reportedly spending up to $400m on the project, while earning an average of £10m a year himself. Studzinski spent some of that money on big name hires: Daniel Palmer, for example, joined from Morgan Stanley in 2006 on a package said to be worth $15m over three years; he returned to Morgan Stanley when it ran out.
In 2016, HSBC hired Matthew Westerman from Goldman Sachs to run its investment bank. Westerman fired 100 people and hired some new ones. He also tried to introduce a new pace to the business, but he too left again 19 months later after ruffling the feathers of HSBC's slower moving incumbents.
Now HSBC is cutting those and other losses under Georges Elhedery, its new CEO. Elhedery is not a banker, but a fixed income trader.
Sources at HSBC said the bank has already told bankers in London to stop originating deals in M&A and ECM, implying that managing directors there may want to leave soon. However, headhunters say their ability to walk into new jobs elsewhere is questionable.
«HSBC has always had a weakness,» says one
Read more on efinancialcareers.com
