
Tiny Pacific nation sparks uproar by banning Facebook; here’s why the government stands firm amid major backlash
Government Defends Ban Amid Backlash
PNG Police Minister Peter Tsiamalili stated the shutdown ensures “responsible usage” of social media, arguing platforms like Facebook enable fake news, child exploitation, and violence. However, opposition leaders and media advocates slammed the decision as “tyranny” and a human rights violation. Opposition MP Allan Bird warned the anti-terrorism law grants unchecked power to officials, calling the move “draconian.” Media Council of PNG president Neville Choi accused the government of political overreach, stressing Facebook’s role as a vital forum for public debate.
Economic and Regional Implications
The ban has disrupted PNG’s informal economy, where many small businesses rely on Facebook for sales. John Pora, head of the Small and Medium Enterprise Corporation, noted thousands of informal traders now face uncertainty. Meanwhile, PNG’s National ICT Authority claimed it was unaware of the shutdown plan, contradicting the police minister’s assertion of interagency coordination. The incident mirrors a 2021 attempt by Solomon Islands to ban Facebook, which failed after public outcry.
FAQs:
Why did Papua New Guinea block Facebook? The government claims it’s a “test” to reduce hate speech and misinformation, but critics argue it suppresses free expression.
How does this affect U.S. readers?
It reflects global challenges in balancing online safety with free speech, a key issue in U.S. tech policy debates.
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)
Read on economictimes.indiatimes.com