fundamental rights (and clubbing together ideas of home, ownership and digital identity). But then, can a right that is so new also be ‘fundamental’? I don’t think so.
It makes me wonder if anyone can ever win against the government. We appear to enjoy fancy rights, but there are caveats and caveats.
Nothing trumps national interest, and the government holds all the cards to define what is in the national interest. There is something ancient about this, about the inequality of the ruler and the subject.
In that way, this injustice seems more natural than esoteric plans to reform it. The government does understand privacy very well.
See how it guards official secrets. Secrecy is state’s right to privacy.
. Read more on livemint.com