Delhi High Court against an order dismissing his defamation case against Chief Minister Atishi. In his plea, Praveen Shankar Kapoor said while rejecting the defamation complaint and quashing the summons issued by a magisterial court, the special judge went «beyond» the scope of his power in law.
Budget with ET
Fraught juggling act draws near for Nirmala Sitharaman. What will Feb 1 bring?
Budget 2025 needs to pull off a big growth trick for the untapped half of its firepower
2 key events coming up for India as world readjusts to Trump 2.0
«The Special Judge has ventured into political adventurism akin to a political discourse by attempting to determine who is a bigger/smaller political entity, which was not at all and never be the scope of adjudication in revision proceedings. The Special Judge did not even permit the complainant to have a trial in order to make good his allegations,» the plea alleged.
Seeking the order to be quashed, the plea said there were various legal infirmities in the it.
«The Special Judge (MP/MLA Cases) has transgressed from the criminal complaint and has dealt with issues which are of little significance to the case in hand,» it added.
According to the complaint by the former media head and spokesperson of the Delhi BJP unit, Atishi levelled baseless allegations in a press conference held on January 27, and later on April 2, 2024 against BJP by saying that it was approaching AAP's MLAs and offering them bribes to the tune of Rs 20-25 crore for switching sides.
Artificial