Meta’s switch to X-like Community Notes for content moderation has come in for severe criticism. Many see it as a step back, raising concerns about how it will handle misinformation and ensure accountability.
ET Year-end Special Reads
Buying a home in 2025? Here's how property market can shape up
18 top stock picks for 2025 from 6 leading brokers
Five big bangs that shook the corporate world in 2024
Alexios Mantzarlis, founding director of the International Fact-Checking Network, criticised Zuckerberg's statement that «the fact-checkers have just been too politically biased, and have destroyed more trust than they've created, especially in the US.» Mantzarlis had worked closely with Meta as the company set up its partnerships, according to Platformer.
«He chose to ignore that a large chunk of the content fact-checkers are flagging is likely not political in nature, but low-quality spammy clickbait that his platforms have commodified. He chose to ignore research that shows Community Notes users are very much motivated by partisan motives and tend to over-target their political opponents,» Mantzarlis said.
«This is a major step back for content moderation at a time when disinformation and harmful content are evolving faster than ever,» said Ross Burley, cofounder of the non-profit Centre for Information Resilience.
Also Read: Meta adopts X's Community Notes: what it means for business
Artificial Intelligence(AI)
Java Programming with ChatGPT: Learn using Generative AI
By — Metla Sudha Sekhar, IT Specialist and