₹1 crore to ₹20 lakh. “The direction of the whole-time member restraining the appellant (IIFL Securities) from taking new clients for a period of two years is set aside," said a SAT bench led by Justice Tarun Agarwala in a 35-page order. “The penalty imposed by the adjudicating officer is reduced to ₹20 lakh.
Any amount deposited in excess, in terms of our order, shall be refunded to the appellant within four weeks from today." The bench said there was “no misuse of the clients funds", and since there was no failure on the part of the appellant to segregate funds of the client, or misuse funds of clients for its own purposes, no penalty could be imposed under Section 23D of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act (SCRA). Section 23D stipulates penalties for not segregating clients’ securities or funds. In June, Sebi’s whole-time member S.K.
Mohanty, in his final order, restrained IIFL Securities from onboarding new clients as a stockbroker for two years. According to the order, Sebi had conducted inspection of IIFL Securities’ books and processes pertaining to April 2011 to December 2013 to ascertain whether it was working in compliance with regulatory guidelines on segregation of client securities. The regulator had also said that it found the actions of IIFL were not in compliance with Sebi’s broker regulations.
The regulator alleged that IIFL had failed to segregate its own funds from clients’ funds, and the company misused credit balances in clients’ funds. Based on the findings, Sebi conducted an investigation. Mohanty observed that IIFL’s past actions didn’t align with established prudent market practices or regulatory instructions.
Read more on livemint.com