The 3% fiscal deficit target: Is it sacrosanct?

livemint.com:

Mint looks at the new approach and the significance of the 3% target set by law. Governments need to live within their means. But with the ability to print money and borrow at will, they often spend more than what they earn, causing fiscal deficit.

So, that’s the difference between revenue and spending (shown as a percentage of gross domestic product). Having a high fiscal deficit is not good economics. It causes inflation to rise and hurts economic growth as it forces interest rates to remain high.

Fiscal consolidation is the process of controlling the fiscal deficit by ensuring that expenditure does not significantly exceed revenue. Most governments do this by setting a legally mandated target. The Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003, mandates the Union government to keep the fiscal deficit below 3% of its gross domestic product.

More than two decades after the law came into effect and for reasons both within and beyond its control, the Centre has not been able to meet this target even once. In FY19, the deficit came down to 3.4% but the pandemic that followed pushed it up to 9.2% in FY21. The Modi government has been aggressively reducing it ever since.

In FY24 it managed to reduce it to 5.6%. The target for FY25 is set at 4.9% and in FY26 it is expected to be below 4.5%. Indian states too are obligated to keep their fiscal deficit under check, and they have done a much better job of it than the Union government.

The aggregate fiscal deficit of the states was well below 3% in four of the last six years. It touched 4% in FY21 post-covid. In FY24, the revised estimates put it at 3.4% and this is expected to decline to 3.1% in FY25.