The Disparity in Retail CFD Trading Legality: US vs UK

livemint.com:

1. Leverage Limits: The FCA has imposed restrictions on leverage available to retail traders, capping maximum leverage at 30:1 for major currency pairs and lower for other asset classes. These limits are designed to reduce the risk of significant losses for retail investors.

2. Negative Balance Protection: The FCA mandates that CFD providers implement negative balance protection for retail clients. This ensures that a trader's losses cannot exceed the funds deposited in their trading account, preventing traders from owing money to the CFD provider.

3. Risk Warnings: CFD providers are required to clearly communicate the risks associated with CFD trading to potential clients, ensuring retail investors are fully aware of the potential losses and risks involved in this type of trading. 4. Client Segregation: The FCA mandates that CFD providers segregate client funds from their operational funds, ensuring client money is protected in the event of insolvency or financial difficulties faced by the CFD provider.

The contrasting regulatory approaches to CFD trading between the US and the UK can be attributed to several factors: The United States generally adopts a more conservative financial regulation approach, prohibiting certain financial products and activities to protect retail investors. The outright ban on retail CFD trading exemplifies this. In contrast, the United Kingdom takes a more balanced approach, permitting retail CFD trading while implementing stringent regulatory measures to safeguard retail investors.