“The fundamental question is whether Plaintiff has a ‘substantial privacy’ interest that ‘outweighs the customary and constitutionally-embedded presumption of openness in judicial proceedings,” Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil wrote in an opinion Wednesday, adding, “Defendants have a right to defend themselves, including by investigating Plaintiff, and the people have a right to know who is using their courts.”
This means if the woman fails to reveal her identity, the lawsuit filed against Sean 'Diddy' Combs can be dismissed. The woman filed the lawsuit as a Jane Doe against Diddy Combs earlier this month, accusing him of raping her in 2004 when she was just 19 years old.
ALSO READ: Sean Diddy's shocking video: When the US rapper invited the 12-year-old actress Daveigh Chase to MTV afterparty
The lawsuit filed by Jane Doe is one of the dozens filed against Sean Diddy 'Combs'. The controversial rapper is in jail for sex trafficking, racketeering, sexual assault, violence, prostitution and other federal charges. The lawsuits have been filed by John or Jane Does who are represented by the same attorneys. The cases are individually filed and before different judges, but the ruling could impact a number of those cases.
Artificial Intelligence(AI)
Master in Python Language Quickly Using the ChatGPT Open AI
By — Metla Sudha Sekhar, IT Specialist and Developer
Artificial Intelligence(AI)
AI for Everyone: Understanding and Applying the Basics on Artificial Intelligence
By — Ritesh