The Supreme Court may soon significantly alter pornography's future. On Wednesday, the Supreme Court justices asked whether Texas' age verification law, which was designed to keep minors from accessing explicit content, hindered adults by comparing contemporary online pornographic content to brick-and-mortar pornographic stories and racy magazines.
Budget with ET
Before budget, a few positives blink on Sitharaman's dashboard
Will Sitharaman make roti, kapada, makaan affordable again?
Rail Budget may see up to 20% hike, focus on station upgrades & modern trains
«What proportion of content on Pornhub is not pornographic?» Samuel Alito, the Justice, inquired. «Do you have essays by the contemporary equivalent of Gore Vidal and William F. Buckley Jr. on it, like the old Playboy?»
In the 1970s, the magazine's contributors included conservative publisher and journalist Buckley and novelist Vidal, both of whom were public intellectuals.
Alito's question, which caused a chuckle in the courtroom, seemed to be intended to contrast the more explicit content of online pornography with the earlier era of «gentleman's magazines» from the previous century, as quoted in a report by The Independent.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett inquired about the differences between online and in-person age verification.
Artificial Intelligence(AI)
Java Programming with ChatGPT: Learn using Generative AI
By — Metla Sudha Sekhar, IT Specialist and Developer
Artificial Intelligence(AI)
Basics of Generative AI: Unveiling Tomorrows Innovations
By — Metla