Executive, legislature to take call on exclusion from reservation: SC
benefits and were in a position to compete with others, were to be excluded from reservation. A bench of Justices B R Gavai and Augustine George Masih made the observation on a plea referring to a seven-judge Constitution bench judgment of the apex court in August last year.
ET Year-end Special Reads
Buying a home in 2025? Here's how property market can shape up
18 top stock picks for 2025 from 6 leading brokers
Five big bangs that shook the corporate world in 2024
«We have given our view that taking into consideration the past 75 years, such persons who have already availed benefits and are in a position to compete with others, should be excluded from reservation. But it is a call to be taken by the executive and the legislature,» said Justice Gavai.
The Constitution bench, by a majority verdict, held states were constitutionally empowered to make sub-classifications within the scheduled castes (SC), which form a socially heterogeneous class, for granting reservation for the upliftment of castes that were socially and educationally more backward among them.
Justice Gavai, who was part of the Constitution bench and penned a separate verdict, had said states must evolve a policy for identifying the «creamy layer» even among the SCs and schedule tribes and deny them the benefit of reservation.
On Thursday, the counsel appearing for the petitioner referred to the apex court's verdict asking for the policy to identify such a «creamy layer».
Artificial Intelligence(AI)
Java Programming with ChatGPT: Learn using
