Supreme Court has sought a response from the government and the Central Board of Direct Taxes on vaccine maker Serum Institute of India's appeal challenging a 2015 amendment to the Income Tax Act that made subsidy, grant, waivers, concessions or reimbursements by Centre or states or incentives in cash or kind taxable.
The amendment had inserted sub-clause (xviii) to Section 2(24), which defines taxable “income”.
A Bench led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud on Monday issued notice to the government and asked it respond in four weeks.
While senior counsel Arvind Datar appeared for SII, the government was represented by Additional Solicitor General N. Venkataraman.
Challenging the Bombay High Court’s judgment that dismissed its 2021 petition, Datar argued that all sorts of subsidies, whether capital or revenue in nature, have been brought within the ambit of income and made taxable though the apex court had held capital subsidy as non-taxable.
Marketing
Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel
By — Neil Patel, Co-Founder and Author at Neil Patel Digital Digital Marketing Guru
Finance
Budget Analysis, Forecasting & Control
By — Mandar V. Joshi, Partner and Head of Technology Implementation, Management Consulting: KPMG
Artificial Intelligence(AI)
Generative AI for Dynamic Java Web Applications with ChatGPT
By — Metla Sudha Sekhar, IT Specialist and Developer
Office Productivity
Advanced Excel Course — Financial Calculations & Excel Made Easy
By — Anirudh Saraf, Founder- Saraf A & Associates, Chartered Accountant
Financ